Nature Ecology and Evolution | Peer-Review Duration, Review Speed Talbots is a leading omni-channel specialty retailer of women's clothing, shoes and accessories. Of major relevance for the peer review process is that it finally comes to a decision, based on consultation with internal and external actors. Reviews for "Nature" - Page 1 - SciRev Empirically, a panoply of orders occur in the manuscript histories, which means that for most of the stages, it is not predetermined in the systems implementation what happens next in the process. Answered by Editage Insights What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? The event information was further enriched with year of submission, pseudonym of journal, and by (pseudonymized) data about the roles (editor, author, reviewer or none) of the person-IDs with regard to the respective manuscripts. Lifting the curtain on editorial decisions - Springer Nature Nature Methods | Peer-Review Duration, Review Speed, Revision Process Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. round 1""nature nature metabolism. The most interesting component of the disintegrated network was, of course, the one which included the four decision events. If authors prefer not to make the review history of their paper at Nature Microbiology known to a new journal, they should not use the transfer service and they should make a new submission instead; the editors will evaluate the paper without reference to the previous review process. RETAIL ASSISTANT MANAGER (OPS) Opening At Talbots Located Within Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a. //-->Editorial process : Springer Support Also, the process as described in the patent and inscribed in the software would be technically open to integrate all kinds of checks at this point even automated detection of content similarity with other papers as presupposition for plagiarism prevention. The two additional source and target nodes make start and end of the process visible. Therefore we deleted the first nine passage points (including source and target). They point out that taking into account different regimes of power in peer review processes as government requires exploring how interests are transformed into processes, that is, sequences of events and formalized activities (ibid., p.23). journals - All Reviewers Assigned : Nature Communications revised Hence, the infrastructure must offer its users a high degree of freedom regarding what they do next. Because of combinatorial explosion, large networks can be expected to be less dense than smaller ones. The site is secure. . As editors, our aim is to send you a decision that will give you the best advice we can about how to move forward to get your work published. The reviewer comments were very helpful to improve the quality of our work, and also the editor was helpful and responsive. The editor is probably going through the reviews to arrive at a decision. How much time does the scientific journal 'Nature' take from - Quora Share Improve this answer Follow answered Jul 2, 2014 at 10:14 user18118 21 1 Add a comment 0 LetPub - Scientific Journal Selector | Nature Energy [CDATA[> Recently Schendzielorz and Reinhart (2020) provided a scheme for analysis of peer review with special regard to its control function in a decision-making process for the distribution of scarce resources. Decline publication, typically on grounds of either there being insufficient support for the conclusions or a reassessment of the level of interest or advance in light of the reviewers' comments. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal In the third section, the data and their preparation are described in more detail, elaborating on why a social network approach appears to be suitable for exploring relationships between events of the editorial process mediated by the system. The analysis may also provide first insights to what extent the events recorded are automatically generated. Abstract: Symbiotic microorganisms are omnipresent in nature, ubiquitously associated with animals, plants, fungi, protists, and all other life forms including humans, ranging fro With editor (Decision Letter Being PreparedReviewers invited) Decision Letter Being Prepared Reviewer (s) invited Under review decline Making an editorial decision. Your revised manuscript should be submitted using the link provided in the decision email, and not as a new manuscript. Learn more. The second possibility is the long decision path from Manuscript Consultation Started through external peer review to Editor Decision Complete. According to Star and Bowker, infrastructures are used to enable, maintain and control collaboration among different actors (Star, 1999; Star and Bowker, 2006). (For one manuscript, no first version was present in the inventory hence, the difference between 14,392 and 14,391 manuscripts). Depending on the journal, the assignment may be done by technical staff, the journal's chief editor, or automatic by submission category or author suggestion. . More information about the manuscript transfer service can be found here. Similarly, disputes on factual issues need not be resolved unless they would have altered the final decision to publish or not. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? n - The .gov means its official. The editorial peer review process for a single manuscript version is investigated from three perspectives: the perspective which considers the sequencialization (which stages are passed in which order) of the process, the pace (how long does a step take) of the manuscript during the process and the magnitude (how many manuscripts go along a specific path). Consequently, the analysis shows how much organizational effort goes into what Schendzielorz and Reinhart (2020) have called the administrative parts of the peer review process to which this article pays particular attention. At the same time, however, editorial management systems as digital infrastructures transform that process by defining sequences, ends, values and evaluation criteria, which are inscribed already in the production process of such devices (see Krger et al., 2021). Usually, the times vary from two to six months, but there is no fixed rule. [email protected] Final decision for XXXXXDecision---Accepted, 52012scientific, PRLAFMScientific reportA201220134a10, 20135a, , B20137b910bcdraftDraftAB20manuSI, nature4440nature physicstransfertransfer20Thanksnice., manuSIresponse letter20, 20Decision sent to author- Waiting for revisionWaiting for revision, , live manuPost Decision Manus (1)live manuPost Decision ManusPost Decision Manuslive manuManu under submission - Manu received - Editor assigned - Manu under consideration - Decision sent to author, NatureManu under considerationundere review, SCI, Bioart/FreescienceQQ, 201451, Final decision for XXXXXDecision---Accepted, 2012scientific, PRLAFMScientific reportA2012, 20134a10, 20135a, nature4440nature physicstransfer, 20Thanksnice., Manu under considerationundere review, . Peer reviewers are assigned to manuscripts, reviewers recommendations are considered and the fate of a manuscript is decided about by the editor. They employ single-blind peer review, which means that the reviewers are aware of the authors identities unless otherwise requested by the authors. In contrast, in our data, the editors play a major role, performing lots of tasks affecting actors with other roles assigned and there is no automated decision making at play, when it comes to the final publishing approval decision. Invite the authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript to address specific concerns. Of all 11,103 manuscripts which make it to a decision at least in one round, the first submitted version is rejected in the vast majority of the cases, whereas manuscripts which make it through the first round, stand a good chance to be accepted in the later stages, as is shown in Figure 1. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. In light of their advice, I am delighted to say that we can in principle offer to publish it in Nature, provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. The patented process is implemented as software, which is then adapted locally to the journals and publishers needs, taking stock of the diversity of scholarly publishing. When we plot the network with Kamada-Kawai layout, the high network density causes the network to appear as a circle (see Figure 4, left) with no visually detectable pattern between source and target. This category is comprised of Waiting for Editor Assignment (N = 14,261), Waiting for Potential Referee Assignment (N = 12,976), Waiting to Send Decision to Author (N = 5,796), Waiting for Revision (N = 2,612), Waiting for Author Approval of Converted Files (N = 898) and Potential Referees Waited too Long (N = 610). [CDATA[// >